These aren't aspirational. They're the failure modes the platform is explicitly shaped around. If you recognize one, you're our user.
The pain: The approved architecture and the deployed architecture stopped agreeing two years ago. Nobody can tell you which is real anymore.
What Syntauros does: Ingest both. Compare. Get a list of every divergence with evidence attached.
The pain: Teams built parallel systems because the official one was too slow or too political. Leadership thinks it owns one stack; reality says four.
What Syntauros does: Scan repos and SaaS surface area. Get a model of what actually exists, including the things nobody told you about.
The pain: You need to pitch a target architecture to a steering committee in three weeks. Your current-state model is a Visio file from 2022.
What Syntauros does: Build a current-state workspace from ingestion. Fork it. Edit the fork into the target. Use the comparison view to tell the story of what changes and why.
The pain: A multi-year program has six workstreams. Each has its own diagrams. No one can tell whether the workstreams are still pointing at the same target.
What Syntauros does: Programs hold workspaces. Workspaces compare. Drift between workstream targets surfaces as a diff, not a meeting.